top of page
  • LinkedIn

Avoiding Common Trademark Application Mistakes

You’ve invested countless hours building your brand — from crafting a standout name to designing the logo, and shaping your business around it. That effort can all be undermined by a single misstep in your trademark application. While some errors can be patched later, others require you to start over entirely — leading to wasted time, new fees, and major frustration.


To avoid that nightmare, it’s crucial to understand which mistakes kill your application, which are fixable with effort, and which you should catch beforehand.



The Three Levels of Trademark Application Errors


Not all mistakes carry the same weight. Applications tend to trip up in one of three categories — each with different consequences for your brand’s protection.


1. Fatal Mistakes (No Room for Error)


These errors cannot be corrected after submission. You must abandon the current application and start a fresh one—with additional filing fees.


- Wrong Owner Listed: The application must name the legal owner of the trademark (whether that’s you personally, your LLC, a corporation, or a partnership). It doesn’t matter who did the paperwork—what matters is who legally owns the rights.

  Example: If two partners equally own a brand but only one files listing themselves as the sole owner, the application fails.


- Incorrect Goods or Services Description: You must describe what you provide under the trademark (e.g., “beer”, “consulting services”), not just where the mark appears (such as “labels” or “ads”).

  Example: A brewery listing their product as “labels” instead of “beer” is a fatal error.


- Generic Terms: You cannot trademark purely generic terms (e.g., “Coffee Shop” for café services, “Organic” for organic foods) because they don’t function to identify a single source.



2. Challenging But Potentially Fixable Mistakes


These are serious issues—but with proper strategy and evidence, they might be overcome.


- Likelihood of Confusion: If your proposed trademark is too similar (in sound, appearance or meaning) to an existing one used for related goods/services, you risk refusal.

Examples:

  - “CloudSync” vs. “Cloud Sink” for cloud services

  - “Bella Boutique” vs. “Beautiful Boutique” for apparel


A thorough search—including international,european registrations, and national registrations and unregistered (common‑law) uses—is essential to spot such conflicts early.



3. Fixable Mistakes


These are common errors that, while problematic, are generally salvageable during the application process.


- Merely Descriptive Trademarks: If your mark simply describes a characteristic of your product/service (e.g., “Soft” for pillows, “Crunchy” for cereal), you’ll struggle to register on the Principal Register unless you can show it has acquired distinctiveness (through long‑use, advertising, consumer recognition). For example, you may instead register on the Supplemental Register as a stepping stone.


- Missing Consent for Names or Likenesses: If your mark includes a person’s name, image or signature (even a private individual), you must obtain written consent to use it before filing.


- Surname‑Only Trademarks: Trying to register a common surname alone (e.g., “Smith”) is risky unless you can show that the surname has acquired recognition as identifying your business (like “Ford” does for automobiles). Otherwise, you may need to register on the Supplemental Register instead of the Principal Register.


- Incorrect Specimens of Use: The specimen you submit must show the mark in actual use in commerce — not just mock‑ups, digitally‑altered images, or generic advertising. For example, the mark on real product packaging or a live webpage qualifies; fake renders do not.



Why Investing in Thorough Trademark Research Pays Off


Before submitting your application, a comprehensive trademark search is your best defense. It allows you to:


  • Spot potential conflicts early (including registered marks, state filings, and common‑law uses) so you don’t waste money on doomed filings.

  • Make smarter branding decisions by choosing a stronger, more defensible mark rather than risking similarity with another.

  • Build a backup plan: If your first choice has issues, you’re ready with alternatives.


When choosing a service to help, check that they cover all relevant databases and assess similarities in sound, appearance and meaning across related goods or services.


In Summary


Trademark application errors span a spectrum—from minor headaches to total disasters. Some mistakes are reversible, others cost you the application altogether. The smartest path? Do the research up front, choose your mark wisely, and file carefully.


Your trademark isn’t just a name or logo — it’s one of your most valuable business assets. Protecting it from the get‑go will save you time, money and brand headaches in the long run.

 
 
 

Comments


WE ARE OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES

EUIPO
WIPO
LR Patentu Valde

© 2025 by Maija Liberte

Privacy Policy

bottom of page